DISQUS

Jamie_Portman · 2 months ago

Its amazing how varied the quality of learning objectives are in schools.

I'm considering stripping Learning and Teaching right down to its basics and reviewing the use of objectives across my school. In saying this, I have been planning on adding the additional twist of 'All - Most - Some' into the mix in order to place emphasis on meeting the needs of cohorts within a class.

Open ended activities can also be differentiated even further via the notion of 'Must - Should - Could' and therefore linking the objectives and the activities together. From experience they compliment each other - ie: the 'SOME' (more able students) may use the 'COULD' aspect of an open ended activity to help to guide their thinking within a task. This aspect of differentiation would certainly encourage 'outstanding' for purposes of an OFSTED observation (if you pull it off) - but more importantly than them bafoons - guide the more able to achieve to their potential.

Thoughts????

Jamie

Roger Neilson · 2 months ago

I come from way before learning objectives. Indeed my training had very little training in it. A neat idea this. My own context can use it. I shall give it a go.

Samantha Lunn · 2 months ago

I am very much on the fence when it comes to learning objectives. As a fairly recently trained teacher I always had to have them on the board/clearly on display at some point towards the start of the lesson whilst in my placement schools.

As an MFL teacher I struggle with the idea of having sentences in English as I strive to have a classroom full of target language use, and I will not destroy that in order to jump through regulatory hoops. Saying that, there are some amazing ways to get pupils speaking in the target language and discussing learning objectives: eg.what they are going to be doing that day (use of the future tense), and remembering what they did last lesson (past tense). This has to be developed as a routine and the language involved can be developed as pupils get more used to the structure and words involved in setting objectives.

What annoys me about setting objectives is that it gives the game away! I do not always want pupils to know that they will be doing a particular topic that lesson - I know exactly what they will be doing, but it again encourages them to speak and guess what they will be doing, and creating a reason for spontaneous discussion.

Also, I wouldnt want to scare pupils by allowing them to realise that they will be looking at a grammar point. Initially it is easier to introduce something like that implicitly, and by the time you get round to a more explicit development of it they feel comfortable as they already know that they can use it and all that is left to find out is the nitty gritty of how it works.

I understand that most classrooms are not like MFL classrooms and it is 0f complete relevance for pupils to know what they are doing and how they are going to get there, but I wonder if it would be better to have weekly or topic learning objective, rather than lesson learning objectives?

As I work in the independent sector I can breath a sigh of relief as I do not have to jump through this particular hoop, however even I can see the benefit of my pupils knowing the path we are about to take together. I just dont want to point out all of the wonderful monuments we will be seeing on the way - Id rather they be in awe of them when they walk past them themselves.

Doug Belshaw · 2 months ago

Thanks for your comment, Samantha. It's a shame that you think of learning objectives as a 'hoop to jump through' rather than as a useful teaching and learning tool.

There's no reason why learning objectives have to given right at the start of the lesson and, as you say, you could have learning objectives that spanned more than one lesson.

Remember as well that learning objectives (on the whole) flag up *skills* rather than content. You might want to read my follow-up blog post about learning objectives (when I publish it!)

aliceayel · 2 months ago

Samantha, being an MFL teacher as well. I do agree with your comment. Setting objectives tend to give the game away. I have been trained to set objectives and it certainly helps to plan your lesson however when I was at school, teachers would not tell us or write the objective on the board and I would enjoy discovering the lesson as it went along. I think the plenary to check if students have met the objective is very important. Very interesting post which got me thinking, thank you.

Doug Belshaw · 2 months ago

Samantha/Alice,

Could you give me an example where setting learning objectives at the start of the lesson would cause problems or 'give the game' away in MFL?

ABCgeorge · 2 months ago

But shouldn't the learning objective be motivating too? You want engagement and I think your initial learning objective did that. Discover is a much more exciting word than list and I think that using non-knowledge based verbs would make for better words to use in LOs.

Doug Belshaw · 2 months ago

Thanks for your input. As I'm going to demonstate in a follow-up post, the trigger words (as you suggest) are critical. You can link these explicitly not only to National Curriculum levels but to Bloom's Taxonomy. :-)

ABCgeorge · 2 months ago

Doug - you got us thinking with your original post (we are sitting across the other side of the world as an SMT of a British school in El Salvador and you managed to divert us from our work on the CIS Accreditation One-Year Report) and we had a really good discussion on Learning Objectives (or Learning Intentions as we call them). It has caused me to rethink this issue.
Looking forward to your future posts on this, thanks for getting us to have a really good discussion at this end.

Doug Belshaw · 2 months ago

El Salvador? Wow! Glad to be of help. I'll be posting further thoughts on learning objectives/intentions in a couple of days' time. :-)

Paddy McGrath · 2 months ago

learning objectives are important, without knowing where we are at or where we are going is there much point to what we are learning.
I sometimes dont always state the Lo at the start of my lessons as we may start with a story to hopefully engage and inspire, but once I have finished the story I link that to the objective and bigger picture otherwise I would feel as though i was baybysitting or entertaining students.

Doug Belshaw · 2 months ago

Your comment about 'babysitting' is interesting - I've seen far too many lessons in my time that are either that or crowd control...

Mike · 2 months ago

Because I do a lot of work with teachers and mapping their curricula, I think objectives are VERY important and I like that there was mention of them being specific AND measurable. These are not hoops to jump through, these are target skills for helping students understand content. Additionally, good objectives/skill statements help to inform and align appropriate assessment practices. If you don't want to "reveal" the objective for fear of "giving the game away," then don't. Those skills are a road map for you to stay on the journey you intended, not necessarily a check off list for student use. Also, if I can add one more thing, it is important, vitally important, for like teachers (grade levels/content areas) to have discussions around this and have a set prioritized curriculum. Besides the obvious benefits for children, it also benefits teachers to be conversational and collaborative about what they do in their classrooms. It doesn't mean that the WAY something is taught must be the same from classroom to classroom, but the WHAT and the HOW are exactly the same. The fact that this is being discussed at all is fantastic. Many teachers (particularly new teachers) are accustomed only to Curriculum Practice decisions. What you're discussing here is all about Curriculum Design, a much more thought-provoking and metacognitive activity to determine what kids should know and be able to do! Kudos!

Doug Belshaw · 2 months ago

Thanks Mike - I absolutely agree about the difference between the *way* and the *what* something is taught. Teachers should teach to their strengths but students need equity of provision.

Richard Smart · 2 months ago

I agree. I can't imagine not using learning objectives. I like the SMART acronym, and the all, many, some (I learned this as: all must, many should, and some could).

While I use objectives to plan my lessons and units, I don't share them with students. We use questions instead, following Christine Counsell's ideas on historical inquiry and the essential questions of Grant Wiggins (http://www.authenticeducation.org/bigideas/arti...). I find that students struggle to internalize objectives, but instantly respond to a question. I guess it is the way we are made?

Doug Belshaw · 2 months ago

Hi Richard. Good points and something I'll be dealing with in a follow-up post. I usually frame my lesson titles as questions - e.g. in the example above it might be 'Who were the Romans?'

Andreajh · 2 months ago

I think the acronym should be smarta. The A being 'active', as in engaged learning. (or smarte!) Then that would help choose active verbs like 'evaluate' 'create' etc. These types of verbs help you create engaged activities for your learners

Doug Belshaw · 2 months ago

The 'trigger verbs' are indeed very important. I shall be dealing with those in a follow-up post. :-)

mrstucke · 2 months ago

We used WALT & WILF in my last school.

We Are Learning Today was the old fashioned objective.

What I'm Looking For was more of a success criteria, it could have been a smart target like you listed above, or in Maths it could have been an example solution showing best practice.

Doug Belshaw · 2 months ago

WALT and WILF are in the Academy's official lesson plan. WALT, however, stands for 'Why Am I Learning This?' and WILF = 'What I'm Looking For' (broken down into ALL, MOST and SOME students...)

Paddy McGrath · 2 months ago

why am i learning this is exceptionally powerful for students getting this right enables us a teachers to provide an meaningful and purposeful lesson. However i can imagine getting authentic walts in all lessons must be challening

Ian Squire · 2 months ago

Why would objective give away the learning. It is possible to have enquiry based learning and effective Learning objective. Remember the brain works best when it knows what it has to do. Correctly written you can have both.

sibrown1 · 2 months ago

I really like;
Content
What am I learning?
Process
How I am learning it?
Benefits
Why I am learning this?
Without learners understanding the importance of the learning objective or intention you run the risk of them become disengaged from the start.

My worry with all, most, some is that it creates a feeling of “well I have achieved “all”, why bother stretching myself” though I do use these myself and they create a great conversation point for differentiation.