<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Doug Belshaw's Open Educational Thinkering - Latest Comments in Ed.D. Thesis snapshot: towards a bedrock definition of literacy.</title><link>http://edtech.disqus.com/</link><description>A blog about the intersection of education, technology and productivity.</description><atom:link href="https://edtech.disqus.com/edd_thesis_snapshot_towards_a_bedrock_definition_of_literacy/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:41:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Ed.D. Thesis snapshot: towards a bedrock definition of literacy.</title><link>http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2009/10/27/ed-d-thesis-snapshot-towards-a-bedrock-definition-of-literacy/#comment-21163807</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Doug,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With ref to your first italicised paragraph, I had precisely the same problem with my thesis; there's just so much out there to read. My supervisor had a real job convincing me that it was time to stop reading and concentrate on the writing. After all, past a certain point, although you're reading 'new' sources, they're really just rehashing or commenting on the core 100 or so you've spent the last 6 months finding and taking notes on! Good luck. DomN&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">domnorrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:41:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ed.D. Thesis snapshot: towards a bedrock definition of literacy.</title><link>http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2009/10/27/ed-d-thesis-snapshot-towards-a-bedrock-definition-of-literacy/#comment-95798175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Doug,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With ref to your first italicised paragraph, I had precisely the same problem with my thesis; there's just so much out there to read. My supervisor had a real job convincing me that it was time to stop reading and concentrate on the writing. After all, past a certain point, although you're reading 'new' sources, they're really just rehashing or commenting on the core 100 or so you've spent the last 6 months finding and taking notes on! Good luck. DomN&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">domnorrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:41:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>