-
Website
http://www.dougbelshaw.com/blog -
Original page
http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2008/06/17/censorship-and-the-personalprofessional-divide/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
berthelemy
4 comments · 1 points
-
Foxburg
6 comments · 1 points
-
kvnmcl
5 comments · 1 points
-
Roger Neilson
5 comments · 1 points
-
antjessop
5 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Some Friday fun!
14 hours ago · 1 comment
-
Mac OSX apps I currently use.
4 days ago · 4 comments
-
Commitments for 2010.
1 week ago · 5 comments
-
How I deal with email.
2 weeks ago · 9 comments
-
Things I learned this week – #1
5 days ago · 2 comments
-
Some Friday fun!
I've always ensured that the disclaimer is at the top of my blog... as someone once said "All opinions mine... who else would want them?". Mark Berthelemy wrote a series of good posts on starting a "work-based" blog which might be useful to others: http://www.learningconversations.co.uk/main/ind...
Ian.
Thanks for calling me 'ballsy'. I'm going to use that as a comeback one day... ;-)
It is (sadly) just the thought of thing I was trying to relate (though not very well) at the EdTechRoundUp flashmeeting on Sunday night when I mentioned I'd removed as much as I could from FriendFeed because you don't want to make it too easy for people (and hi to the guy who I know is tracking this comment now - you've still got nothing on me because there is nothing!)
By this I mean, there are those out there who are looking to make mischief, looking to twist words/statements and however squeaky clean and unashamed of ourselves we may be, once we put our opinions/activities into the public arena we are open to this sort of thing.
While I think the disclaimer you have added makes excellent sense, particularly professionally, isn't it a shame we have to do these things?!
pedagogy. Those with money (i.e. companies) win. Gotta love capitalism...
:-o
Legally, I should add, they don't have a leg to stand on. Had it been me, I wouldn't have changed the blog post, because they wouldn't have got it off the ground. You explained why you didn't like it - they should be asking for help to make the product better.
I don't blog with a legal "personal opinion" disclaimer, because I expect people to read it knowing it's me talking, not a lawyer.
I do take care to try and not offend anybody, but still express my own opinion.
If you'd stated that it was your personal opinion in the original post, then do you think that might have changed the reaction?
If somebody says they hate your product, then I'd always take the view that it's an opinion. It would be different if the view was expressed by somebody who's supposed to be impartial (for example, a civil servant speaking in an official capacity) - but that isn't what you're doing...
I've been on both sides of the fence - once I worked for a company where a specific teacher in a school was constantly writing online about the poor experience his schoopl had with a product. The rest of the school were happy with it, and this had been confirmed by the IT team and the leadership team, but he wrote in a way that presented it as his school's opinion, not his own. In that case, there was a conversation with the school, not to stop the teacher saying what they wanted, but to ask them to ensure that it wasn't presented as the school's view.
All the research says that the most valuable source of advice and information that schools listen to before buying a product is other colleagues. If teachers aren't positive about your product experience, fix it or help them find the positive, and you'll get more people wanting to buy!
We're entering a world where real world opinions count much more. Imagine if Tom Clancy got his lawyers to write to everybody who gave his books a panning on Amazon.com...
My reply is below. I'm sure you can read between the lines:
Thanks for your email. First of all, may I iterate the fact that I am not a journalist and to treat me as such would be to fundamentally misunderstand the way that the world works in these days of Web 2.0.
An opinion cannot be 'fundamentally inaccurate'. My comments that I found it 'cumbersome' and that staff at my school weren't using it because it's so un-userfriendly I stick by. Because of this opinion, which I have now removed from the blog post, my school was contacted by xxx xxxxxx from your organization. She said, and I quote:
"We may want to ask Doug to issue a press release withdrawing his comments and likewise on his podcast and blog, we may want to seek legal advice. I think Doug's comments are very contentious at best."
That doesn't sound like a company who wants to enter into dialogue to me or to improve their product. Threatening me with legal action unless I remove something through my website and - even worse - going through my employers to do so is tantamount to censorship to me.
Please note that any reply to this email may find itself in the public domain.
If mild negative comments are censored through threats of litigation, the aggregation of false positive praise and the absense of a critical voice does not bode well for the online consumer in the future.
As I'm mentioned elsewhere I worked for many years in the IT industry and I understand the value of reputation - it's a shame that vendors who simply don't get how the web works don't work out how to use it properly.
I now work for two universities and I'm also employed as an elearning consultant for a number of HEIs and FEIs in the South East. Anyone want to make a guess at platform vendors I might not consider supporting if anyone asks my opinion? It's not just about the software but it's about the company selling the software and even if the kit tears up trees if you can't trust the vendor it's simply not going to happen.
As it has been expressed here , they actually don't have a leg to stand on (I have checked with my wife the solicitor) as you were only expressing a personal opinion / preference.
Don't mark too hard Doug!